Basel Committee to consider disclosure requirements for banks’ crypto assets

189
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS

Related articles


The fallout from the banking disaster earlier this yr continues because the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision considers requiring banks to reveal their crypto asset holdings. The committee, which operates underneath the aegis of the Financial institution for Worldwide Settlements, recognized holding crypto as one of many components that led to the demise of a number of banks in March.

At its assembly on Oct. 4–5, the committee seemed on the causes behind the failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Financial institution of New York and First Republic Bank, in addition to the near-failure of Credit score Suisse, which was later bought by its competitor UBS.

Associated: Crypto acted as safe haven amid SVB and Signature bank run: Cathie Wood

According to the committee’s report, three structural tendencies might have not directly contributed to the banks’ failures: the growing function of nonbank intermediation lately, crypto belongings concentrated in a small variety of banks and the flexibility of consumers to maneuver their funds quicker as a result of growing digitalization.

The report additionally examined coverage points intimately.

Supervisory and regulatory points within the banking disaster of 2023. Supply: Basel Committee

The report particularly highlighted the function of crypto within the failure of Signature Financial institution. The committee discovered:

SBNY’s important shopper focus of digital asset corporations put it in a precarious place when the “crypto winter” hit in 2022. […] SBNY’s poor governance and insufficient danger administration practices put the financial institution ready the place it couldn’t successfully handle its liquidity in a time of stress.

Signature was closed by the New York State Division of Monetary Providers on March 12. The regulators said on the time that crypto was not behind its choice.

The dialogue is just not a sign of deliberate revisions to the Basel Framework, the report mentioned. In January, the committee amended its framework to limit crypto belongings in financial institution reserves to 2%.

An announcement accompanying the report said a session paper on crypto asset publicity disclosure could be printed quickly.

That is solely the newest rehash of the banks’ troublesome days in March. The USA Federal Reserve Financial institution and the Federal Deposit Insurance coverage Company (FDIC) published their conclusions on the occasions in April, with the FDIC taking another look at it in August.

Journal: Home loans using crypto as collateral: Do the risks outweigh the reward?